Pain Qualified Prospect Feed — Validated with live OSHA enforcement data

A Data-Driven Outbound Workflow for Squint

Using federal OSHA enforcement records to identify manufacturers who have failed the same safety training or procedure standard twice, at the exact moment they are legally required to fix it.

20–30
ICP-qualified manufacturers per month
$1.1M
Largest single penalty in sample
Validated Workflow

The “OSHA Repeat Citation Cascade”

A repeat OSHA citation is government-certified proof that a manufacturer failed at the same safety procedure twice. That failure — and the mandatory corrective action window that follows — is Squint's ideal entry point.

How It Works

1
Query the Department of Labor enforcement dataset (updated daily) filtering for NAICS 31–33 manufacturers with repeat citations on OSHA standards 1910.147 (lockout/tagout), 1910.212 (machine guarding), and 1910.1200 (hazard communication).
2
Filter for ICP-sized companies (100+ employees, multi-facility indicators) to eliminate small shops outside Squint's target market.
3
Flag the specific standards cited to map them to Squint's product capabilities: repeat LOTO failures = missing or ineffective digital work instructions; repeat machine guarding = AR overlay gap at the equipment level.
4
Enrich each company with Apollo contact data to surface the VP of Operations, Plant Manager, or Director of EHS who owns the corrective action plan.
5
Deliver verified lead cards with citation details, penalty amount, abatement deadline, and a direct framing connecting the specific OSHA failure to what Squint solves.
Source
DOL OSHA Enforcement Data
Refresh
Daily
Volume
20–30 ICP-qualified leads/month
Buying Window
15-day contest period + 6-month abatement
Validation Score: 21 / 25 — PASS
Verified Lead Cards

Manufacturers in Active Abatement Windows

Four real manufacturers, cited for repeat OSHA violations in the last seven months. Each is mid-remediation, legally required to demonstrate corrective action, and in the optimal window for Squint outreach.

Perfect ICP Match
New Horizons Baking Co. Norwalk, Ohio (multi-facility)
3 Repeat Violations
Violations Lockout/tagout training failure (repeat), failure to de-energize machines during maintenance (repeat), inadequate machine guarding (repeat)
Penalty $394,849 proposed
Cited December 16, 2025
Abatement Window 6 months from citation date — corrective action plan required
OSHA Standards 29 CFR 1910.147 (LOTO), 29 CFR 1910.212 (Machine Guarding)
Contact Target VP of Operations or Plant Manager (multiple Ohio facilities)
Virginia Transformer Corp. Pocatello, Idaho
3rd Inspection in 12 Months
Violations 53 serious and repeat violations: faulty crane controls, machine guarding failures, fall hazards, inadequate PPE procedures — same hazards found across three consecutive inspections
Penalty $986,888 proposed
Cited December 8, 2025
Pattern Repeat violations on same hazards from 2024 inspections — behavioral training has demonstrably failed
Contact Target Director of EHS or VP of Manufacturing
Taylor Farms New Jersey Inc. Swedesboro, New Jersey
Fatality + Willful Repeat
Violations 16 violations including willful and repeat lockout/tagout failures — no documented LOTO procedures, no training records for sanitation workers
Penalty $1,125,484 proposed
Cited November 24, 2025 (worker fatality May 2025)
Urgency Board-level visibility, OSHA re-inspection pending, litigation risk — peak urgency for documented corrective action
Parent Company Taylor Fresh Foods Inc. — multi-state fresh produce operation
Progressive Converting Inc. Appleton, Wisconsin
Amputation + 3 Repeat Violations
Violations 3 repeat violations: machine guarding on converting equipment, missing energy control procedures, inadequate LOTO training — employee suffered two fingertip amputations during servicing
Penalty $280,110 proposed
Cited July 31, 2025 — abatement period ongoing
Industry Paper products manufacturing (converting/packaging)
Contact Target Plant Manager or Director of Operations

Why This Signal Is Unusually Strong Right Now

Lockout/tagout (1910.147) has been the #1 or #2 most-cited OSHA standard in manufacturing for seven consecutive years. The repeat citation rate is rising because manufacturers are correcting violations with updated written policies rather than behavioral change — and OSHA's follow-up inspections are finding the same failures.

Maximum repeat violation penalty increased to $165,514 per violation in January 2025 (up 2.6% from 2024). For companies with three or more repeat violations, total penalties now routinely exceed $400K — creating board-level urgency that did not exist at lower penalty thresholds.

The 6-month abatement window is the optimal outreach window: the company is legally committed to fixing the problem, budget has been allocated for remediation, and the plant manager is actively evaluating solutions before the OSHA follow-up inspection.

Backup Workflows (Passed Theoretical Evaluation)

Severe Safety Incident — Fatality/Amputation Trigger

Monitors OSHA Severe Injury Reports (mandatory filings within 8–24 hours of a fatality or amputation) at manufacturing facilities. Surfaces companies at the exact moment an OSHA investigation opens and corrective action planning begins. Requires careful messaging tone around a sensitive event.

Product Recall — Manufacturing Quality Failure

Uses CPSC Recalls API and openFDA enforcement data to identify consumer goods manufacturers with recalls caused by production process failures. Recall classification and root cause text identifies companies where inadequate procedure adherence caused the defect — directly addressable with Squint's platform.

EPA Environmental Violation at Manufacturing Facility

Queries EPA ECHO database for manufacturing facilities with Significant Noncompliance (SNC) designations tied to procedural violations. Particularly effective for chemical manufacturers and processors where Squint's HazCom procedure delivery is the direct solution.

FDA 483 Documentation & Training Failures

Targets food and pharmaceutical manufacturers that received FDA Form 483 observations citing inadequate training procedures or documentation gaps. Best for companies in FDA-regulated verticals (food, beverage, nutraceuticals) that are already in Squint's customer base.

Training Coordinator Hiring Surge

Identifies manufacturers posting three or more training coordinator or EHS coordinator roles simultaneously, a signal that the company is expanding training headcount rather than deploying technology — creating a strong ROI conversation around replacing $60–80K headcount with Squint's platform.

What You’re Looking At

The lead cards in this report aren’t a one-time research project. They’re a sample of what a Pain-Qualified Prospect Feed looks like — monitoring the OSHA enforcement database continuously and surfacing manufacturers with repeat citations on standards your platform directly addresses, the week the citation drops.

What the Feed Looks Like

Every Week
5–7 newly cited manufacturers matching this workflow’s signal, with penalty amounts, citation standards, and abatement deadlines.
Week 1 Onboarding
ICP & Pain Signal Map for manufacturing verticals, outreach templates mapped to citation type, competitive landscape snapshot.
Monthly Refinement
Tell us which prospects converted to meetings, we adjust the NAICS filters, penalty thresholds, and citation standard weights.
The Guarantee
20–30 pain-qualified manufacturers with verified contact info every month — or you don’t pay for that month.

Built for B2B sales teams who’d rather have reasons to call than names to guess from.

Want to see the full OSHA Repeat Citation Cascade list?

We pull the current batch of repeat-cited manufacturers from the OSHA enforcement database, enrich each one with VP Ops and Plant Manager contacts, and walk you through it live. You’ll see exactly what lands in your inbox each week before you commit to anything.

Get a Free Sample